Skip to content

Geology is the Way

Packing

Packing is a parameter that described how grains are organized in a clastic sedimentary rock with respect to each other. In first order, clastic rocks can be:

matrix-supported, when grains are not in contact and are suspended in finer matrix
grain-supported: when grains are in contact with each other.

This difference is important, because it indicates the type of transport a sediment have experienced. Selective transport (e.g. rivers) removes matrix and sorts specific grain sizes, while non-selective transport (e.g. glaciers) produce deposits with much matrix around grains. Recognizing how grains are packed is useful to understand how much matrix is still present in the interstices between grains.

Theoretical packing of spherical particles. Cubic packing is unstable and tends to evolve to orthorhombic packing with compaction. Graphics: Samuele Papeschi/GW.

In a theoretical packing of grains with spherical shape and point contacts, the empty pores between grains contain between 47.6% and 25.9% of available space over the rock volume (porosity), depending on the type of packing. The available pore spaces, which can be filled by matrix, cement or remain empty, progressively reduce if the contacts between grains are not point contacts. Here are the possible situations:
point contacts: grains touch only in a point
long contacts: long sides of grains touch each other
concavo-convex contacts: concave sides of grains penetrates into convex sides of other grains
sutured contacts: wriggly boundaries with grains interpenetrating each other.

The type of contacts between grains determines the porosity, and hence the percentage of matrix, if pores are filled. Point contacts and long contacts can form at deposition, whereas concavo-convex and sutured contacts indicate progressive compaction (reduction of pore spaces) during diagenesis. A rock with prevailing long contacts, concavo-convex contacts, and sutured contacts has pore spaces, and eventually matrix, < 15%. This can be useful to recognize mature, low-matrix rocks like arenites and orthoconglomerates.

Type of contacts between grains in clastic sedimentary rocks. Graphics: Samuele Papeschi/GW.

References
Compton, R. R. (1962). Manual of field geology. Soil Science93(4), 295.
Dott, R. H. (1964). Wacke, graywacke and matrix; what approach to immature sandstone classification?. Journal of Sedimentary Research34(3), 625-632.
Folk, R. L. (1980). Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill publishing company.
Lewis, D. W., & McConchie, D. (2012). Analytical sedimentology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Powers, M. C. (1953). A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. Journal of Sedimentary Research23(2), 117-119.
Wentworth, C. K. (1922). A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. The journal of geology30(5), 377-392.
        

it_IT Italiano
Detrital and Authigenic Minerals
Textures
Sedimentary Structures
Fossils
Sedimentary Rocks

 

Do you like this page?